Spatial Response of Cantilever Beam Under End Moment and End Force
2 min read • 416 wordsFollowing , the problem of plane
flexure from Section
{reference-type=“ref”
reference=“sec:circle”} is now altered by introducing the point load
in addition to the moment
so as to induce a three-dimensional response. A uniform
mesh of 10, 2-node elements is used, and the reference moment in
Equation (
{reference-type=“ref”
reference=“eq:fref”}) for
is applied in a single load
step. Because the deformation is no longer plane, each choice of nodal
parameterization essentially equilibriates the moment in a different
coordinate system. Results are reported in
Table
{reference-type=“ref”
reference=“tab:helical-perturb01”}, where the None/None/None
and
Incr/None/Incr
variants match the values reported by
for the formulations by
and ,
respectively.
Once again, the application of external isometry or
parameter transformations does not affect the convergence
characteristics of the solution.
The problem is simulated again, but now the moment is consistently
applied with a spatial orientation. Formulations whose final residual
moment vector is conjugate to the spatial variations
of the rotation
do not need to be treated differently. This
includes both elements with the None
parameter transformation and
transformed elements with the Petrov-Galerkin formulation. For the
simulations with all other elements, a transformation of the nodal force
is necessary, as described in
.
Table
{reference-type=“ref”
reference=“tab:helical-perturb02”} lists the tip displacements for the solution.
To demonstrate the behavior of the proposed formulations under large
rotations, the reference moment value
in
Equation (
{reference-type=“ref”
reference=“eq:fref”}) is now increased to
with a large
out-of-plane force of
. The model discretization uses 100
linear finite elements, and the loading is applied in 200
steps under
load factor control.
Figure
{reference-type=“ref” reference=“fig:helix”} shows the final deformed shape alongside a plot
of the tip displacement in the direction of the concentrated force.
These results are in agreement with the literature
.
See also
These parameters were used by .
It is reported in that an axial stiffness of was used for simulation, but observe that this may be a reporting error. The authors believe that the simulations of have been performed with the parameters of the present study. ↩︎